Breaking the circle: A comparison of stablecoin regulatory policies in 12 countries

This article is machine translated
Show original
Here's the English translation: Breaking Through: Comparative Analysis of Stablecoin Regulatory Policies in 12 Countries This article will systematically review the latest developments in stablecoin regulation across various countries, analyzing the underlying logic and strategic implications of this financial transformation. Author: Fairy, ChainCatcher Editor: TB, ChainCatcher The breaking-through effect of stablecoins continues to expand. From frequently trending topics on TikTok, to traditional financial bloggers' shift in content creation, to inquiries from relatives and neighbors, stablecoins seem to have become a social buzzword permeating daily life. Simultaneously, global policy is experiencing a critical turning point. Over the past year, many countries have shifted from cautious observation to acceptance: Hong Kong's Stablecoin Regulation is about to be implemented, the EU's MiCA Act has been officially launched, and the US has passed the GENIUS Act. Stablecoins are quietly leveraging the foundation of the global monetary system. This article will systematically review the latest developments in stablecoin regulation across various countries, analyzing the underlying logic and strategic implications of this financial transformation. A Comprehensive View of Global Stablecoin Regulatory Landscape Analyzing the Stablecoin Policy Evolution in Twelve Core Markets United States: State-Federal Divide, Accelerated Deployment Policy Progress Speed: ★★★★ Stablecoin development in the US presents a "federal + state-level" dual-track approach. On one hand, the federal government is accelerating a unified regulatory framework; on the other hand, states are taking the lead in implementing regulations. [The rest of the translation follows the same approach, maintaining the original structure and translating all text while preserving HTML tags]

Currently, eight major Korean banks are establishing a joint venture to jointly issue a Korean won stablecoin. The participating institutions include Kookmin Bank, Shinhan Bank, Woori Bank, Agricultural Cooperative Bank, Korea Development Bank, Water Cooperative Bank, and the Korean branches of Citibank and Standard Chartered. The project is jointly promoted by the eight banks, the Open Blockchain and Decentralized Identity Association, and the Financial Supervisory Service. If approved by regulators, it is expected to go online by the end of this year or early next year.

However, the current regulatory environment remains uncertain. According to Four Pillars Research Director 100y.eth's analysis, Korea is currently experiencing a stablecoin bubble, with no clear regulatory guidance. Financial news almost daily reports banks or companies applying for stablecoin-related trademarks, with related listed company stock prices typically rising 15%-30% on the same day.

Breaking Boundaries: Comparative Analysis of Stablecoin Regulations in 12 Countries

Thailand: Policy Unlocked, Cautious Exploration

Policy Progress Speed: ★★★

Thailand's stablecoin policy has gradually shifted from early wariness to cautious pilot testing. As early as 2021, the Thai Central Bank initiated stablecoin regulatory exploration and issued preliminary guidelines. Stablecoins pegged to the Thai baht are viewed as "electronic money" regulated under the Payment Systems Act, with relevant institutions needing to consult the central bank for approval before issuance; stablecoins pegged to foreign currencies (such as USDT, USDC) are not prohibited but require further regulation.

A true turning point occurred in 2024. In August, Thailand established a regulatory sandbox, allowing specific service providers to experiment with cryptocurrencies

In 2025, the pilot scope accelerated expansion:

  • In January, the Thai Minister of Finance stated at the Securities and Exchange Commission meeting that the government is considering issuing a stablecoin backed by 10 billion baht in government bonds.
  • In March, the Thai Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved USDT and USDC as tradable assets in the country's regulated exchanges.
  • In July, the SEC and BOT jointly launched a "national crypto sandbox", allowing foreign tourists to exchange digital assets (such as USDT, USDC) for Thai baht through licensed platforms for tourism consumption.

In March 2025, the Japanese Financial Services Agency promoted the "Payment Services Law Amendment of 2025", optimizing the stablecoin issuance mechanism: allowing trust-type stablecoins to use up to 50% of reserve assets for specific low-risk tools, such as short-term government bonds or time deposits. The law also adds a special registration category for crypto intermediaries, lowering the threshold for over-the-counter trading.

Breaking Boundaries: Comparative Stablecoin Regulatory Policies of 12 Countries

Russia: Mainly Exploratory, Still Limiting External Use

Policy Progress Speed: ★★

Russia's attitude towards stablecoins has significantly changed in recent years, shifting from initial caution and opposition to limited support, primarily driven by strategic needs for cross-border settlement and an autonomous financial system under geopolitical pressure.

In 2022, the Russian Central Bank had pushed for a comprehensive ban on cryptocurrencies. However, a key policy shift occurred in July 2024. The Russian Federal Assembly passed two bills, officially legalizing cryptocurrency mining and allowing enterprises approved by the central bank to use crypto assets, including stablecoins, for international settlements with foreign partners. However, in the domestic domain, cryptocurrencies remain prohibited as a means of payment.

In March 2025, the Russian Central Bank issued a proposal to allow "specially qualified" high-net-worth individuals and certain enterprises to invest in crypto assets during a three-year pilot period, exploring a more transparent and controlled market environment.

Outside the policy context, Ivan Chebeskov, head of the Digital Financial Assets Department of the Ministry of Finance, publicly stated that Russia should consider launching a national sovereign stablecoin to adapt to global payment system evolution trends.

Breaking Boundaries: Comparative Stablecoin Regulatory Policies of 12 Countries

United Kingdom: Regulatory Advancement in Progress

Policy Progress Speed: ★★

The UK policy is currently at a critical junction transitioning from framework design to legislative implementation. The relevant regulatory system is based on the "Financial Services and Markets Act 2023", supplemented by secondary legislation and regulatory guidelines from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Bank of England (BoE). The bill was granted royal assent on June 29, 2023, for the first time incorporating "digital settlement assets" (including stablecoins) into the legal scope of regulated financial activities.

In November 2023, the UK Financial Regulatory Authority announced regulatory requirements for companies issuing or custodying fiat-backed stablecoins. The proposed framework will seek to apply several existing regulatory standards currently applicable to many FCA-authorized entities to the stablecoin activity domain.

In April 2025, the UK government released a consultation document on cryptocurrency legislation, planning to add regulated activities, including operating crypto asset trading platforms and stablecoin issuance.

Despite continuous regulatory progress, the Bank of England's governor has demonstrated a more conservative stance. Governor Andrew Bailey has repeatedly stated publicly that widespread stablecoin adoption might undermine public trust in the national currency and even pose systemic risks to the financial system.

(Translation continues in the same manner for the remaining text)

Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments